User talk:Karunama - Revision history

BetaNotus: Sorry if anyone gets a notification from this! Just removing some old, unused links.

2021-06-17T19:53:13Z

Sorry if anyone gets a notification from this! Just removing some old, unused links.

Karunama: /* Welcome */

2014-10-12T20:39:15Z

‎Welcome

Gorgonzola: Comment, trimmed down older topics.

2014-10-12T10:15:04Z

Comment, trimmed down older topics.

Gorgonzola: /* Creature Type Pages */

2014-10-07T21:00:41Z

‎Creature Type Pages

Gorgonzola: /* Creature Type Pages */

2014-10-07T20:57:45Z

‎Creature Type Pages

Karunama: /* Beast Form Pages */

2014-10-07T16:02:04Z

‎Beast Form Pages

Gorgonzola: /* Beast Form Pages */

2014-10-07T13:09:02Z

‎Beast Form Pages

Gorgonzola: Reply regarding naming convention for the Beast form skills.

2014-10-07T13:07:26Z

Reply regarding naming convention for the Beast form skills.

Karunama: /* Beast Form Pages */

2014-10-07T12:14:22Z

‎Beast Form Pages

Karunama: /* Beast Form Pages */

2014-10-07T12:13:59Z

‎Beast Form Pages

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Note that categories like "Mushrooms" may limit our ability later to index various item types, but that depends on how much is really worthwhile to index. To be honest I did the "Likes" categories mostly to learn how they work. Atm I usually just "/wiki spoons" for example, and the wiki search will give me the relevant NPCs due to the text search. So atm I just don't know what is going to be the use for them, but I am not at all experienced in MediaWiki so maybe I am missing something. One idea in the longer term would be to add little icons next to the items in the "Small Talk" section, and clicking those will go to the category page, showing other NPCs that like the similar item.  --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:44, 2 October 2014 (CDT)
-PS: Oh I see what you did there with the [[:Category:Likes]] page, good idea :) --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:50, 2 October 2014 (CDT)
+PS: Oh I see what you did there with the '''Category:Likes'''page, good idea :) --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:50, 2 October 2014 (CDT)
 ==NPC Shop Icons==
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ==Creature Type Pages==
-Hi Karu, as discussed I'm wondering how to handle the creature types. (you seemed to have interest in that part of the wiki). Atm creature type more or less equals in-game Anatomy classification right? Thats probably the more logical way to go. So we have "Arthropod", "Fungoid", "Goblin", etc. First I would suggest to make new pages, reather than use the Category Page themselves. [http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Arachnid Here is an example from GWW Arachnids]. Perhaps on that page you can list the Anatomy XP you wanted to? On this page we can make an automatic list with DPL tag. The ones we don't have an article yet, we can just manually list them in that page so we don't forget about it. I would do just like GWW and use a simple page name: "Fungoid", "Goblin", "Giant", "Plant" ,etc. If needed later we can add the anatomy pages (the sub skills), so eg. "Dinosaur" is the creature type, and "Dinosaur Anatomy" would be a skill page (if we ever want to document these).  Only too generic name I can see is "Plant" ("Biting Vine"s in Sun Vale). For Therese, you used [[:Category:Plants]] (plural) as the Likes category, so there is no collision there. Let me know what you think. --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 20:32, 6 October 2014 (CDT)
+Hi Karu, as discussed I'm wondering how to handle the creature types. (you seemed to have interest in that part of the wiki). Atm creature type more or less equals in-game Anatomy classification right? Thats probably the more logical way to go. So we have "Arthropod", "Fungoid", "Goblin", etc. First I would suggest to make new pages, reather than use the Category Page themselves. [http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Arachnid Here is an example from GWW Arachnids]. Perhaps on that page you can list the Anatomy XP you wanted to? On this page we can make an automatic list with DPL tag. The ones we don't have an article yet, we can just manually list them in that page so we don't forget about it. I would do just like GWW and use a simple page name: "Fungoid", "Goblin", "Giant", "Plant" ,etc. If needed later we can add the anatomy pages (the sub skills), so eg. "Dinosaur" is the creature type, and "Dinosaur Anatomy" would be a skill page (if we ever want to document these).  Only too generic name I can see is "Plant" ("Biting Vine"s in Sun Vale). For Therese, you used '''Category:Plants''' (plural) as the Likes category, so there is no collision there. Let me know what you think. --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 20:32, 6 October 2014 (CDT)
 So to clarify I propose to make these pages named exactly: Aberration, Arthropod, Bear and Bugbear, Canine, etc. (exactly as written in the in-game anatomy sub-skills). I fixed "Dinosaurs" (Dinosaur) and "Ruminant Ungulate" (Ruminant) as these didn't correspond to the in-game skills pane. All these pages are non-plural (unlike the "Likes" categories). If you're fine with that, feel free to go ahead with any of these pages. --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 20:45, 6 October 2014 (CDT)
-: I went ahead and created a few pages to get a better idea of how that would work. As you mentioned that you planned to "make (anatomy) page link to the relevant creature anatomy info".. I edited a few links in there. So you can see the general picture: Anatomy sub-skills table links to the creature type pages ("Aberration", "Undead", etc). Hopefully that's what you meant. On each creature type page I put a small mention of the Autopsy Kit (links back to Anatomy page). Those pages use DPL tag to list the currently categorized creatures. The other ones we can add manually for whenever we feel like adding the page later (the red links can act as a todo list basically, eg. in [[Plant]] I put one I found that I don't have time to document atm). If you have ideas for this page feel free to make something like [[Creature Type Template]] so we can decide on a structure there? --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 15:57, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
+: I went ahead and created a few pages to get a better idea of how that would work. As you mentioned that you planned to "make (anatomy) page link to the relevant creature anatomy info".. I edited a few links in there. So you can see the general picture: Anatomy sub-skills table links to the creature type pages ("Aberration", "Undead", etc). Hopefully that's what you meant. On each creature type page I put a small mention of the Autopsy Kit (links back to Anatomy page). Those pages use DPL tag to list the currently categorized creatures. The other ones we can add manually for whenever we feel like adding the page later (the red links can act as a todo list basically, eg. in [[Plant]] I put one I found that I don't have time to document atm). If you have ideas for this page feel free to make something like '''Creature Type Template''' so we can decide on a structure there? --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 15:57, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
 : PS: As you can see I used the in-game Anatomy sub-skills description to get a basic intro for the page. --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 16:00, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Regarding your recent edit of Spider Form. Actually I think it would make sense to use "Pig Form" or maybe "Pig (beast form)". When I started editing here, there was already "Cow Form", which seemed logical. But then there is "Lycanthropy" instead of "Werewolf Form"... Personally I would prefer to have consistent "Animal Form" page names, as the Deer, Pig, Spider are too generic articles and intuitively sound like the basic creature or type. Let me know what if you want you can go ahead making the "xxx Form" pages and moving content there, and blank the ones behind. I know a player may /wiki spider ... In that case I would suggest to add to the intro of the basic creature "A player can turn into (animal), see [[animal Form]]". How's that sound? --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 05:04, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
-:I agree that it should be internally consistent, so if I was going to consider the best way to do it, IMHO it would be [[Spider (Skill)]].  That way Lycanthropy and the various beast forms stay heterogenous, both with themselves and all the other battle skills. [[User:Karunama|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
+:I agree that it should be internally consistent, so if I was going to consider the best way to do it, IMHO it would be '''Spider (Skill)'''.  That way Lycanthropy and the various beast forms stay heterogenous, both with themselves and all the other battle skills. [[User:Karunama|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
-:: Sure, I like that. Makes sense , it is a full skill line right. So [[Spider (Skill)]], [[Cow (Skill)]], etc. Not sure wjhat you mean with Lycanthropy. Should we have [[Lycanthropy (Skill)]] or [[Werewolf (Skill)]]? i think the latter may be easier for players? --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:07, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
+:: Sure, I like that. Makes sense , it is a full skill line right. So '''Spider (Skill)''' [[Cow (Skill)]], etc. Not sure wjhat you mean with Lycanthropy. Should we have '''Lycanthropy (Skill)''' or '''Werewolf (Skill)'''? i think the latter may be easier for players? --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:07, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
-:: Btw, if you blank out a page sometimes and don't know what to do with it, you can use <code>#REDIRECT [[pagename]]</code> to make it into a redirect. (presumably that does the exact same thing as "Move", it is not possible to truly move a page it seems, or not obvious at all). --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:09, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
+:: Btw, if you blank out a page sometimes and don't know what to do with it, you can use <code>#REDIRECT <nowiki>[[pagename]]</nowiki></code> to make it into a redirect. (presumably that does the exact same thing as "Move", it is not possible to truly move a page it seems, or not obvious at all). --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:09, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
 ::: Definitely Lycanthropy (Skill).  That's how it appears in the game's skill tab, after all. [[User:Karunama|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama|talk]]) 11:02, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 12 October 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Btw, I meant to say thanks for the [[Sanja]] and [[Jace Soral]] additions, really nice! Hmm this just got me thinking, would it make sense to have a category for Beast friendly NPCs? We could pull a list with DPL tag on the beast form pages. Though I don't know myself if beast friendly NPCs talk to all beasts or only certain kinds. --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 05:15, 12 October 2014 (CDT)		Btw, I meant to say thanks for the [[Sanja]] and [[Jace Soral]] additions, really nice! Hmm this just got me thinking, would it make sense to have a category for Beast friendly NPCs? We could pull a list with DPL tag on the beast form pages. Though I don't know myself if beast friendly NPCs talk to all beasts or only certain kinds. --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 05:15, 12 October 2014 (CDT)
		+
		+	:It isn't uniform between them. For example, I know that Mushroom Jack, the Hogan's Keep goblins, Azalak, etc. all speak to all beast form players, however Suspicious Cow only speaks to Deer, Pigs, and Cows, and I'm fairly certain Sanja only speaks to Wolves (It was full moon when I last spoke to her, so I couldn't check). No doubt there are other exceptions I haven't found yet. [[User:Karunama\|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama\|talk]]) 15:39, 12 October 2014 (CDT)

	==Categories==		==Categories==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Welcome, and thanks for helping out :)
+==Welcome==
---[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 11:08, 29 September 2014 (CDT)
+Welcome, and thanks for helping out :) --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 11:08, 29 September 2014 (CDT)
-'''About categories'''. Note that categories like "Mushrooms" may limit our ability later to index various item types, but that depends on how much is really worthwhile to index. To be honest I did the "Likes" categories mostly to learn how they work. Atm I usually just "/wiki spoons" for example, and the wiki search will give me the relevant NPCs due to the text search. So atm I just don't know what is going to be the use for them, but I am not at all experienced in MediaWiki so maybe I am missing something. One idea in the longer term would be to add little icons next to the items in the "Small Talk" section, and clicking those will go to the category page, showing other NPCs that like the similar item.  --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:44, 2 October 2014 (CDT)
+Btw, I meant to say thanks for the [[Sanja]] and [[Jace Soral]] additions, really nice! Hmm this just got me thinking, would it make sense to have a category for Beast friendly NPCs? We could pull a list with DPL tag on the beast form pages. Though I don't know myself if beast friendly NPCs talk to all beasts or only certain kinds. --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 05:15, 12 October 2014 (CDT)
 PS: Oh I see what you did there with the [[:Category:Likes]] page, good idea :) --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 08:50, 2 October 2014 (CDT)
 ==NPC Shop Icons==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 7 October 2014
Line 18:		Line 18:

	: I went ahead and created a few pages to get a better idea of how that would work. As you mentioned that you planned to "make (anatomy) page link to the relevant creature anatomy info".. I edited a few links in there. So you can see the general picture: Anatomy sub-skills table links to the creature type pages ("Aberration", "Undead", etc). Hopefully that's what you meant. On each creature type page I put a small mention of the Autopsy Kit (links back to Anatomy page). Those pages use DPL tag to list the currently categorized creatures. The other ones we can add manually for whenever we feel like adding the page later (the red links can act as a todo list basically, eg. in [[Plant]] I put one I found that I don't have time to document atm). If you have ideas for this page feel free to make something like [[Creature Type Template]] so we can decide on a structure there? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 15:57, 7 October 2014 (CDT)		: I went ahead and created a few pages to get a better idea of how that would work. As you mentioned that you planned to "make (anatomy) page link to the relevant creature anatomy info".. I edited a few links in there. So you can see the general picture: Anatomy sub-skills table links to the creature type pages ("Aberration", "Undead", etc). Hopefully that's what you meant. On each creature type page I put a small mention of the Autopsy Kit (links back to Anatomy page). Those pages use DPL tag to list the currently categorized creatures. The other ones we can add manually for whenever we feel like adding the page later (the red links can act as a todo list basically, eg. in [[Plant]] I put one I found that I don't have time to document atm). If you have ideas for this page feel free to make something like [[Creature Type Template]] so we can decide on a structure there? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 15:57, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
		+
		+	: PS: As you can see I used the in-game Anatomy sub-skills description to get a basic intro for the page. --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 16:00, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

	==Beast Form Pages==		==Beast Form Pages==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 7 October 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:

	So to clarify I propose to make these pages named exactly: Aberration, Arthropod, Bear and Bugbear, Canine, etc. (exactly as written in the in-game anatomy sub-skills). I fixed "Dinosaurs" (Dinosaur) and "Ruminant Ungulate" (Ruminant) as these didn't correspond to the in-game skills pane. All these pages are non-plural (unlike the "Likes" categories). If you're fine with that, feel free to go ahead with any of these pages. --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 20:45, 6 October 2014 (CDT)		So to clarify I propose to make these pages named exactly: Aberration, Arthropod, Bear and Bugbear, Canine, etc. (exactly as written in the in-game anatomy sub-skills). I fixed "Dinosaurs" (Dinosaur) and "Ruminant Ungulate" (Ruminant) as these didn't correspond to the in-game skills pane. All these pages are non-plural (unlike the "Likes" categories). If you're fine with that, feel free to go ahead with any of these pages. --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 20:45, 6 October 2014 (CDT)
		+
		+	: I went ahead and created a few pages to get a better idea of how that would work. As you mentioned that you planned to "make (anatomy) page link to the relevant creature anatomy info".. I edited a few links in there. So you can see the general picture: Anatomy sub-skills table links to the creature type pages ("Aberration", "Undead", etc). Hopefully that's what you meant. On each creature type page I put a small mention of the Autopsy Kit (links back to Anatomy page). Those pages use DPL tag to list the currently categorized creatures. The other ones we can add manually for whenever we feel like adding the page later (the red links can act as a todo list basically, eg. in [[Plant]] I put one I found that I don't have time to document atm). If you have ideas for this page feel free to make something like [[Creature Type Template]] so we can decide on a structure there? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 15:57, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

	==Beast Form Pages==		==Beast Form Pages==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 7 October 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:

	:: Btw, if you blank out a page sometimes and don't know what to do with it, you can use <code>#REDIRECT [[pagename]]</code> to make it into a redirect. (presumably that does the exact same thing as "Move", it is not possible to truly move a page it seems, or not obvious at all). --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 08:09, 7 October 2014 (CDT)		:: Btw, if you blank out a page sometimes and don't know what to do with it, you can use <code>#REDIRECT [[pagename]]</code> to make it into a redirect. (presumably that does the exact same thing as "Move", it is not possible to truly move a page it seems, or not obvious at all). --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 08:09, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
		+
		+	::: Definitely Lycanthropy (Skill). That's how it appears in the game's skill tab, after all. [[User:Karunama\|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama\|talk]]) 11:02, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 7 October 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:: Sure, I like that. Makes sense , it is a full skill line right. So [[Spider (Skill)]], [[Cow (Skill)]], etc. Not sure wjhat you mean with Lycanthropy. Should we have [[Lycanthropy (Skill)]] or [[Werewolf (Skill)]]? i think the latter may be easier for players? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 08:07, 7 October 2014 (CDT)		:: Sure, I like that. Makes sense , it is a full skill line right. So [[Spider (Skill)]], [[Cow (Skill)]], etc. Not sure wjhat you mean with Lycanthropy. Should we have [[Lycanthropy (Skill)]] or [[Werewolf (Skill)]]? i think the latter may be easier for players? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 08:07, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
		+
		+	:: Btw, if you blank out a page sometimes and don't know what to do with it, you can use <code>#REDIRECT [[pagename]]</code> to make it into a redirect. (presumably that does the exact same thing as "Move", it is not possible to truly move a page it seems, or not obvious at all). --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 08:09, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 7 October 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:I agree that it should be internally consistent, so if I was going to consider the best way to do it, IMHO it would be [[Spider (Skill)]]. That way Lycanthropy and the various beast forms stay heterogenous, both with themselves and all the other battle skills. [[User:Karunama\|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama\|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2014 (CDT)		:I agree that it should be internally consistent, so if I was going to consider the best way to do it, IMHO it would be [[Spider (Skill)]]. That way Lycanthropy and the various beast forms stay heterogenous, both with themselves and all the other battle skills. [[User:Karunama\|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama\|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
		+
		+	:: Sure, I like that. Makes sense , it is a full skill line right. So [[Spider (Skill)]], [[Cow (Skill)]], etc. Not sure wjhat you mean with Lycanthropy. Should we have [[Lycanthropy (Skill)]] or [[Werewolf (Skill)]]? i think the latter may be easier for players? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 08:07, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 7 October 2014
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Regarding your recent edit of Spider Form. Actually I think it would make sense to use "Pig Form" or maybe "Pig (beast form)". When I started editing here, there was already "Cow Form", which seemed logical. But then there is "Lycanthropy" instead of "Werewolf Form"... Personally I would prefer to have consistent "Animal Form" page names, as the Deer, Pig, Spider are too generic articles and intuitively sound like the basic creature or type. Let me know what if you want you can go ahead making the "xxx Form" pages and moving content there, and blank the ones behind. I know a player may /wiki spider ... In that case I would suggest to add to the intro of the basic creature "A player can turn into (animal), see [[animal Form]]". How's that sound? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 05:04, 7 October 2014 (CDT)		Regarding your recent edit of Spider Form. Actually I think it would make sense to use "Pig Form" or maybe "Pig (beast form)". When I started editing here, there was already "Cow Form", which seemed logical. But then there is "Lycanthropy" instead of "Werewolf Form"... Personally I would prefer to have consistent "Animal Form" page names, as the Deer, Pig, Spider are too generic articles and intuitively sound like the basic creature or type. Let me know what if you want you can go ahead making the "xxx Form" pages and moving content there, and blank the ones behind. I know a player may /wiki spider ... In that case I would suggest to add to the intro of the basic creature "A player can turn into (animal), see [[animal Form]]". How's that sound? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 05:04, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

−	:I agree that it should be internally consistent, so if I was going to consider the best way to do it, IMHO it would be [[Spider (Skill)]]. That way Lycanthropy and the various beast forms stay heterogenous, both with themselves and all the other battle skills.	+	:I agree that it should be internally consistent, so if I was going to consider the best way to do it, IMHO it would be [[Spider (Skill)]]. That way Lycanthropy and the various beast forms stay heterogenous, both with themselves and all the other battle skills. [[User:Karunama\|Karunama]] ([[User talk:Karunama\|talk]]) 07:14, 7 October 2014 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 7 October 2014
Line 19:		Line 19:
	==Beast Form Pages==		==Beast Form Pages==
	Regarding your recent edit of Spider Form. Actually I think it would make sense to use "Pig Form" or maybe "Pig (beast form)". When I started editing here, there was already "Cow Form", which seemed logical. But then there is "Lycanthropy" instead of "Werewolf Form"... Personally I would prefer to have consistent "Animal Form" page names, as the Deer, Pig, Spider are too generic articles and intuitively sound like the basic creature or type. Let me know what if you want you can go ahead making the "xxx Form" pages and moving content there, and blank the ones behind. I know a player may /wiki spider ... In that case I would suggest to add to the intro of the basic creature "A player can turn into (animal), see [[animal Form]]". How's that sound? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 05:04, 7 October 2014 (CDT)		Regarding your recent edit of Spider Form. Actually I think it would make sense to use "Pig Form" or maybe "Pig (beast form)". When I started editing here, there was already "Cow Form", which seemed logical. But then there is "Lycanthropy" instead of "Werewolf Form"... Personally I would prefer to have consistent "Animal Form" page names, as the Deer, Pig, Spider are too generic articles and intuitively sound like the basic creature or type. Let me know what if you want you can go ahead making the "xxx Form" pages and moving content there, and blank the ones behind. I know a player may /wiki spider ... In that case I would suggest to add to the intro of the basic creature "A player can turn into (animal), see [[animal Form]]". How's that sound? --[[User:Gorgonzola\|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola\|talk]]) 05:04, 7 October 2014 (CDT)
		+
		+	:I agree that it should be internally consistent, so if I was going to consider the best way to do it, IMHO it would be [[Spider (Skill)]]. That way Lycanthropy and the various beast forms stay heterogenous, both with themselves and all the other battle skills.