Changes

Hi Karu, as discussed I'm wondering how to handle the creature types. (you seemed to have interest in that part of the wiki). Atm creature type more or less equals in-game Anatomy classification right? Thats probably the more logical way to go. So we have "Arthropod", "Fungoid", "Goblin", etc. First I would suggest to make new pages, reather than use the Category Page themselves. [http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Arachnid Here is an example from GWW Arachnids]. Perhaps on that page you can list the Anatomy XP you wanted to? On this page we can make something like the category listing for any other pages that exist under the category (the individual creatures, whichever ones are documented so far)an automatic list with DPL tag. The other oneswe don't have an article yet, we could can just add manually list them in those pages thenthat page so we don't forget about it. I would do just like GWW and use a simple page name: "Fungoid", "Goblin", "Giant", "Plant" ,etc. If needed later we can add the anatomy pages (the sub skills), so eg. "Dinosaur" is the creature type, and "Dinosaur Anatomy" would be a skill page (if we ever want to document these). Only too generic name I can see is "Plant" ("Biting Vine"s in Sun Vale). For Therese, you used [[:Category:Plants]] (plural) as the Likes category, so there is no collision there. Let me know what you think. --[[User:Gorgonzola|Gorgonzola]] ([[User talk:Gorgonzola|talk]]) 20:32, 6 October 2014 (CDT)